• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Davis+Gilbert LLP

From our base in New York, we represent a diverse range of clients across the country and around the world.

  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
Insights + Events
bookmarkprintPDFShare>

Trends in Marketing Communications Law - May 24, 2018

FDA Withdraws Anti-Aging Import Alert and Continues Oversight Over Cosmetics Claims

5th Edition: Trends in Marketing Communications Law

In late 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officially withdrew Import Alert 66-38, “Skin Care Products Labeled as Anti-Aging Creams” (IA 66-38), potentially opening the doors for cosmetics manufacturers and marketers to make stronger anti-aging claims.

For the past 30 years, IA 66-38 was used to detain imported skin care and cosmetic products with labels containing claims that the product would affect the aging process, including by rejuvenating, repairing or restructuring the skin. The FDA said such claims would categorize the product as a “drug,” resulting in a denial of entry into the United States. This posed a problem for products manufactured abroad, which could not bear claims similar to domestically manufactured products.

While the FDA did not provide a basis for withdrawing IA 66-38, it may be a sign that the FDA now considers certain claims indicating a product’s efficacy in addressing the appearance of aging are appropriate, as they are currently included on domestic products. However, a product label claiming that it will affect a structure or function of the skin, such as by repairing or rejuvenating the skin, should continue to be viewed with caution for all skin care and cosmetic products.

Additionally, the Trump administration has continued to oversee the regulation of cosmetics, including through the issuance of multiple warning letters. In the letters, the FDA singled out claims that products had “anti-inflammatory” or “anti-redness” properties or are appropriate for skin with rosacea, eczema or psoriasis. The FDA found that these claims rendered the products to be new and unapproved drugs.

Key Takeaways

  • The FDA’s withdrawal of IA 66-38 may open the doors for imported skin care or cosmetic products claiming anti-aging properties.
  • Despite the FDA’s withdrawal, companies should avoid making any claims that a product will affect a structure or function of the body.
  • Companies should continue to vet all product packaging, marketing and websites to ensure compliance with FDA regulations and review claims through a conservative lens.

Download a PDF of this AlertDownload

Primary Sidebar

Related People

  • Attorney Stu Friedel

    Stuart Lee Friedel

    Of Counsel

    Area Of Focus

    • Advertising + Marketing
    212 468 4818
    sfriedel@dglaw.com
  • Media item displaying Brooke Erdos Singer

    Brooke Erdos Singer

    Partner

    Area Of Focus

    • Intellectual Property + Media
    • Advertising + Marketing
    212 468 4940
    bsinger@dglaw.com
  • View All

Related Services

  • Advertising + Marketing
  • Marketing and Promotions
  • Regulated Products and Industries

Get the latest insights from Davis+Gilbert

Subscribe
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • About Us
  • Location
  • Subscribe
© 2025 Copyright Davis+Gilbert LLP. Attorney Advertising.
  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
  • Insights + Events
  • Culture + Community
  • Pro Bono + Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Location
This site uses cookies to store information on your device. These cookies either support essential functions of the site or are used to develop analytics regarding usage of our site. Click Accept to continue using the site with our recommended settings or click Decline to disable non-essential cookies.AcceptDecline