• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Davis+Gilbert LLP

From our base in New York, we represent a diverse range of clients across the country and around the world.

  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues

New Jersey

All Bets Are Off (or On): SCOTUS Strikes Down Federal Ban on Sports Betting

May 21, 2018 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The Supreme Court held 6-3 that federal law prohibiting states from enacting sports betting schemes was an unconstitutional "commandeering" of state law issues by the federal government. In striking down the prohibition, the Court paved the way for states to decide for themselves Continue Reading

Alert - May 21, 2018

New Jersey Supreme Court Rejects No-Harm TCCWNA Claims, Dealing Blow to Consumer Class Actions Under the Act

May 16, 2018 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The New Jersey Supreme Court's recent holding is expected to eliminate no-harm class actions under the TCCWNA. Violations of the statute, unaccompanied by any injury to the consumer, will no longer be sufficient to support a claim. The need for class action plaintiffs to prove Continue Reading

Alert - May 16, 2018

New Jersey Enacts New Equal Pay Protections Effective July 1, 2018

May 7, 2018 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line Effective July 1, 2018, New Jersey's equal pay law will provide several new measures aimed at preventing unequal pay among employees performing substantially similar work. New Jersey employers must re-examine employee salaries to make sure any existing pay differentials are Continue Reading

Alert - May 7, 2018

Courts Begin to Rein in Scope of New Jersey Truth in Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act

May 10, 2017 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line As the barrage of TCCWNA-related class actions continues, courts are beginning to rein in the scope and applicability of New Jersey’s consumer protection statute. Claims by consumers who allege technical violations without any separate, identifiable harm may finally begin to Continue Reading

Alert - May 10, 2017

Suit Challenges Jos. A. Bank Clothiers’ “Up to” Percent Off Advertising

April 19, 2017 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line The class action lawsuit against Jos. A. Bank should serve as a reminder to advertisers to carefully consider state laws when advertising "up to" discounts or price ranges. Furthermore, this shows how class actions are serving in a very real capacity to replace regulatory actions. Continue Reading

Alert - April 19, 2017

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • About Us
  • Location
  • Subscribe
© 2025 Copyright Davis+Gilbert LLP. Attorney Advertising.
  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
  • Insights + Events
  • Culture + Community
  • Pro Bono + Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Location
This site uses cookies to store information on your device. These cookies either support essential functions of the site or are used to develop analytics regarding usage of our site. Click Accept to continue using the site with our recommended settings or click Decline to disable non-essential cookies.AcceptDecline