• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Davis+Gilbert LLP

From our base in New York, we represent a diverse range of clients across the country and around the world.

  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues

trademark

LawInSport | Controlling Athletes’ Trademarks: What Can Sports Learn From WWE’s Trademark Ownership?

October 15, 2021 by Catherine Nagle

In the context of professional wrestling, the names and ring names of professional wrestlers who are affiliated with World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (WWE) have been the subject of trademark applications and registrations with the USPTO. Common products and services associated with wrestlers’ Continue Reading

Publication - October 15, 2021

Bright Ideas | Puff Puff Passing Off: Chronic Trademark Issues in the Growing Industry of Legal Cannabis

September 14, 2021 by Catherine Nagle

As James Franco’s dealer character in stoner classic Pineapple Express eruditely demonstrates in the foregoing quote, branding has always been integral to the cannabis market. Until very recently, the cannabis consumer base had to rely solely on the goodwill attached to names of (often proprietary) Continue Reading

Balancing Compliance and Creativity in Regulated Industries, Publication - September 14, 2021

Black Lives Matter Movement Sparks Branding Changes

October 6, 2020 by Patrick Quinn

7th Edition: Trends in Marketing Communications Law The tragic killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery this year, among others, have reinvigorated the Black Lives Matter movement, resulting in powerful nationwide conversations about racial injustice in the United States, with Continue Reading

Trends in Marketing Communications Law - October 6, 2020

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Willfulness Is Not Required to Recover Profits

July 7, 2020 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split on April 23, 2020, by unanimously holding in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc., et al. that a brand owner is not required to prove that a trademark infringer acted willfully in order for the owner to be awarded Continue Reading

Alert - July 7, 2020

Brexit’s Impact on European Union Trademarks

February 25, 2020 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The United Kingdom (UK) left the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020 after mutual ratification of the Withdrawal Agreement, thus making “Brexit” official. The UK is now in a transition period until December 31, 2020, during which EU laws, including those that pertain to the Continue Reading

Alert - February 25, 2020

Thomson Reuters Practical Law | Trademark Laws: New York

August 26, 2019 by Catherine Nagle

A Q&A guide to New York laws protecting trademarks. This Q&A addresses state laws governing trademark registration, infringement, dilution, counterfeiting, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices. Answers to questions can be compared across a number of jurisdictions (see Trademark Continue Reading

FAQ, Publication - August 26, 2019

No Longer “FUCT” — Scandalous Mark Provision Struck Down by Supreme Court

July 10, 2019 by Catherine Nagle

6th Edition: Trends in Marketing Communications Law What constitutes a “scandalous” trademark? The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been grappling with this question since the enactment of the 1905 Trademark Act, later codified in the 1946 Lanham Act, which forbids Continue Reading

Trends in Marketing Communications Law - July 10, 2019

Patent and Trademark Office Clarifies Rules for Cannabis Trademarks

July 2, 2019 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line Now that the USPTO has issued this guidance, its examiners can be expected to issue decisions on pending cannabis-related trademark applications. Companies with applications pre-dating December 20, 2018, or considering filing new applications, should keep the essential elements of Continue Reading

Alert - July 2, 2019

Trademark License Rights Survive Rejection in Bankruptcy

June 10, 2019 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line The Mission Product decision should resolve uncertainty created by the circuit split between the First Circuit and Seventh Circuit decisions. The Supreme Court’s ruling should also reassure trademark licensees that should their licensor end up in bankruptcy, absent contract terms Continue Reading

Alert - June 10, 2019

1-800 Contacts Unlawfully Restricted Competitors’ Trademark Use In Search Engine Marketing

November 19, 2018 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The FTC has made clear that some common online advertising methods, such as bidding on a competitor’s trademark in search engine marketing, may not always be contracted away, especially when they result in restricting consumers’ access to competitive pricing information. Parties Continue Reading

Alert - November 19, 2018

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • About Us
  • Location
  • Subscribe
© 2026 Copyright Davis+Gilbert LLP. Attorney Advertising.
  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
  • Insights + Events
  • Culture + Community
  • Pro Bono + Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Location
This site uses cookies from third party providers for them to collect and store information from and on your device. These cookies either support essential functions of the site or are used to develop analytics regarding usage of our site. Click Accept to continue using the site with our recommended settings or click Decline to disable non-essential cookies. See our Privacy Policy for more information.AcceptDeclinePrivacy policy