• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Davis+Gilbert LLP

From our base in New York, we represent a diverse range of clients across the country and around the world.

  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues

Advertising + Marketing Alert

SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract Modified to Provide “Free Bargaining” as to Compensation for Low-Budget Digital Productions

October 24, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line Effective immediately, the SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract has been modified to include a waiver allowing for "free bargaining" of economic terms for digital productions with a budget of $50,000 and under. A mid-contract waiver of this magnitude is rare and signals a clear Continue Reading

Alert - October 24, 2017

FTC Settles with Mobile App Developer Over Unauthorized Charges

October 17, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The Pact case demonstrates that marketers can incur liability even when consumers affirmatively agree to be charged on a recurring basis. Unlike other negative option cases, there is no allegation here that consumers did not knowingly enter into a continuity plan – on the contrary, Continue Reading

Alert - October 17, 2017

FTC Charges Online Negative Option Marketing Scheme with Deceiving Shoppers

October 17, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The FTC’s complaint, and the district court’s response, highlight the continuing regulatory scrutiny into negative option marketing practices and the importance of disclosing the material terms of an offer in a clear and conspicuous manner to consumers before they pay or incur a Continue Reading

Alert - October 17, 2017

Local Challenges to Automatic Renewal Programs Continue in California: Now, the Beachbody Case

September 28, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line As the Beachbody case illustrates, businesses must clearly disclose to consumers the terms of auto-renewal programs and should obtain their express, affirmative consent before collecting any payments. Many states, as well as the federal government, have laws that address this Continue Reading

Alert - September 28, 2017

First Circuit Requires Identifiable Injury for Claims Asserting Deceptive Retailer “Compare At” Prices

September 18, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line Recent decisions from the First Circuit reign in consumers' ability to bring actions alleging false advertising in retailers' "Compare At" pricing, unless a consumer can demonstrate actual, identifiable harm separate from the mere purchase of a good in order to claim damages. Continue Reading

Alert - September 18, 2017

FTC Brings First Ever Enforcement Action Against Individual Social Media Influencers; Updates Warnings and Guidance for Influencers and Marketers

September 12, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The FTC’s action against Martin and Cassell and the new round of FTC warning letters make clear that the FTC will bring actions against influencers who violate the Endorsement Guides. Consequently, all parties involved in influencer marketing, from marketers, agencies, influencer Continue Reading

Alert - September 12, 2017

FTC Reviews Rules, including CAN-SPAM, to Keep Pace with Changing Times

July 17, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The FTC has announced its plans to review the Picture Tube Rule, the Textile Rules, the Energy Labeling Rule and the CAN-SPAM Rule. These rules aim to protect consumers while promoting healthy competition between businesses. The FTC's regulatory review is part of its ongoing effort Continue Reading

Alert - July 17, 2017

Instagram Adds Paid Partnership Tool for Transparency

July 17, 2017 by Patrick Quinn

The Bottom Line The new Instagram branded content tool is intended to provide greater transparency in the social media space by disclosing relationships between influencers and brands.Implementing this tool appears to be Instagram’s response to the FTC’s growing concern about paid endorsements on Continue Reading

Alert - July 17, 2017

Trampoline Sellers Settle FTC Charges Over Alleged Fake Logos, Websites and Reviews

June 9, 2017 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line As evidenced by the FTC's action against the Le brothers, companies should not use fake review sites or misleading third-party endorsements or seals to sell their products or disparage competing products.Instead, they should clearly and conspicuously disclose material connections Continue Reading

Alert - June 9, 2017

Amazon, FTC Withdraw Appeal of Decision Holding Amazon Liable for Billing Parents for Children’s Unauthorized In-App Charges

April 26, 2017 by Catherine Nagle

The Bottom Line The district court's decision, no longer subject to appeal, is a clear statement that the unauthorized billing of parents for in-app purchases made by their children without informed parental consent violates the FTC Act. This case serves as a reminder that companies need to ensure Continue Reading

Alert - April 26, 2017

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • About Us
  • Location
  • Subscribe
© 2025 Copyright Davis+Gilbert LLP. Attorney Advertising.
  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
  • Insights + Events
  • Culture + Community
  • Pro Bono + Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Location
This site uses cookies to store information on your device. These cookies either support essential functions of the site or are used to develop analytics regarding usage of our site. Click Accept to continue using the site with our recommended settings or click Decline to disable non-essential cookies.AcceptDecline