• Skip to content

Davis+Gilbert LLP

From our base in New York, we represent a diverse range of clients across the country and around the world.

  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues

Alert

Behavioral Advertising Developments: A Compliance Warning and an Enforcement Action

The Bottom Line Companies engaged in IBA should pay particular attention to two recent compliance developments regarding the enhanced notice in video ads and the new cross-device guidance.As advertising retargeting methods and media continue to evolve, companies must always consider at the outset Continue Reading

Alert - January 11, 2018

FTC Announces First COPPA Action Involving Connected Toys

The Bottom Line As the first COPPA case involving connected toys, the FTC's settlement with VTech should be a reminder to all companies that they must fully comply with COPPA and must take reasonable steps to protect sensitive data, particularly any data collected from children. In addition, Continue Reading

Alert - January 11, 2018

California Enacts New Employer Requirements Effective January 1, 2018

The Bottom Line California employers should be aware of several new and expanded laws going into effect beginning January 1, 2018, relating to a ban on inquiries to candidates about their salary history or prior criminal convictions; expanding already-mandated, supervisor-level sexual harassment Continue Reading

Alert - December 19, 2017

Another Look at Sun Capital: PE Fund Faces Claims for Unfunded Pension Liability of a Portfolio Company

The Bottom Line While the court has not yet reached a decision on Trilantic’s complaint, PE firms should continue to carefully consider the structure and nature of their portfolio company investments to assess any potential exposure for pension withdrawal liability. In this post-Sun Capital time, Continue Reading

Alert - December 13, 2017

Battling the Real “Fake News”: FTC Reaches Multi-Million Dollar Settlement with Internet Marketers for False Celebrity Endorsements

The Bottom Line The FTC's settlement with the Defendants allegedly engaged in these deceptive marketing practices serves as a reminder that the parties responsible for online advertising using public figures’ names and images without authorization can be identified and stopped, and that those Continue Reading

Alert - November 30, 2017

IRS Begins Issuing ACA Penalty Notices to Employers

The Bottom Line The IRS has started enforcing penalties under the ACA, and ALEs and their staff should be on the lookout for a possible ESRP notice. If an ALE receives a notice, it should reach out to its ERISA counsel immediately and begin reviewing its IRS Forms 1094-C and 1095-C. Any ALE that Continue Reading

Alert - November 21, 2017

Appeals Court Enforces Arbitration Clause in Hyperlinked Terms & Conditions

The Bottom Line The Second Circuit’s Meyer decision reaffirms the importance of well-crafted terms and conditions for companies interacting with consumers over the Internet and via mobile apps, and that for those terms to be enforceable, access to them must be presented in a manner clear Continue Reading

Alert - November 2, 2017

SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract Modified to Provide “Free Bargaining” as to Compensation for Low-Budget Digital Productions

The Bottom Line Effective immediately, the SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract has been modified to include a waiver allowing for "free bargaining" of economic terms for digital productions with a budget of $50,000 and under. A mid-contract waiver of this magnitude is rare and signals a clear Continue Reading

Alert - October 24, 2017

FTC Settles with Mobile App Developer Over Unauthorized Charges

The Bottom Line The Pact case demonstrates that marketers can incur liability even when consumers affirmatively agree to be charged on a recurring basis. Unlike other negative option cases, there is no allegation here that consumers did not knowingly enter into a continuity plan – on the contrary, Continue Reading

Alert - October 17, 2017

FTC Charges Online Negative Option Marketing Scheme with Deceiving Shoppers

The Bottom Line The FTC’s complaint, and the district court’s response, highlight the continuing regulatory scrutiny into negative option marketing practices and the importance of disclosing the material terms of an offer in a clear and conspicuous manner to consumers before they pay or incur a Continue Reading

Alert - October 17, 2017

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 50
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • About Us
  • Location
  • Subscribe
© 2025 Copyright Davis+Gilbert LLP. Attorney Advertising.
  • People
  • Services
  • Emerging Issues
  • Insights + Events
  • Culture + Community
  • Pro Bono + Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Location
This site uses cookies from third party providers for them to collect and store information from and on your device. These cookies either support essential functions of the site or are used to develop analytics regarding usage of our site. Click Accept to continue using the site with our recommended settings or click Decline to disable non-essential cookies. See our Privacy Policy for more information.AcceptDeclinePrivacy policy