| |
FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENACTED
Although several Federal statutes, including the False Claims Act
and the Civil Service Reform Act provided protection and even rewards
to whistleblowers in certain circumstances, most employees were not
protected at the Federal level if they took action in the face of
wrongdoing by their employers
Ralph W. Norton (rnorton@dglaw.com)
Ronald Urbach (rurbach@dglaw.com)
e-mail this article URL
Until recently, there was no general Federal law protecting individuals
who report or cooperate in the prosecution of corporate or employer
wrongdoing. Although several Federal statutes, including the False
Claims Act and the Civil Service Reform Act provided protection and
even rewards to whistleblowers in certain circumstances, most employees
were not protected at the Federal level if they took action in the
face of wrongdoing by their employers. In particular, there was no
Federal law protecting employees who reported violations of the Federal
securities laws by their employers.
Two little-noticed provisions of the recently-enacted
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") have changed that.
One of the provisions, Section 806 of the Act, relates specifically
to violations of the Federal statutes relating to fraud and provides
for a civil remedy. The other provision, Section 1107 of the Act,
pertains to violations of any Federal law, rule or regulation and
provides for fines and imprisonment of offenders.
The Act, which was signed into law by President
Bush on July 30, 2002, is a watershed piece of legislation that
addresses many problems that have come to light this past year in
the corporate scandals involving Enron Corp., Worldcom Inc., Adelphia
Communications Corp. and other prominent companies. While the principal
focus of the Act is corporate compliance with the Federal securities
laws, the Act also affects the Bankruptcy Code, the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA), and other areas, including Federal
laws relating to obstruction of justice. (See the separate article
dealing with those other issues of the Act in this issue.)
Section 806 of the Act prohibits public, reporting
companies and their officers, directors, employees and other agents
from retaliating against any employee by discharging, demoting,
suspending, threatening, harassing or otherwise discriminating against
the employee in the terms of employment for providing information
or assisting an investigation conducted by a Federal agency, Congress
or a person with supervisory authority over the employee regarding
conduct the employee reasonably believes is a violation of Federal
law prohibiting mail fraud, fraud by wire, radio or television,
bank fraud or securities fraud. Employees are also protected if
they file, testify or otherwise participate in a proceeding relating
to any such violation.
Section 806 creates a private right of action
on the part of the employee. The employee must first file a complaint
with the Secretary of Labor within 90 days of the retaliatory action.
The employee may seek reinstatement and back pay, as well as any
other damages necessary to make him or her whole, including litigation
costs, expert witness fees and attorneys' fees. If the Secretary
of Labor does not issue a final decision in the case within 180
days after the complaint was filed, the employee may bring an action
in Federal district court.
Section 806 is codified as Section 1514A of Title
18 of the United States Code.
Section 1107 of the Act amends Section 1513 of
Title 18 to provide simply that any person who, with the intent
to retaliate, takes any action harmful to a person for providing
truthful information to a law enforcement officer relating to the
commission or possible commission of any Federal offense will be
fined or imprisoned for up to 10 years, or both.
© 2001 Davis & Gilbert LLP |