| Nike v. Kasky
In February 2003, Davis & Gilbert
filed with the U.S. Supreme Court an amicus brief and lodging on
behalf of the Association of National Advertisers, Inc (ANA), the
American Advertising Federation (AAF) and the American Association
of Advertising Agencies (AAAA) in the Nike v. Kasky First Amendment
commercial speech case. The brief voices the advertising industry's
concerns about the adverse impact the California Supreme Court's
decision below, concerning commercial speech and California's false
advertising statutes, could have on advertising. The lodging contains
representative samples of the wide array of advertisements that
could be affected by the Kasky decision. In June 2003, the U.S.
Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the issue
was not ready for appeal. Justices Breyer and O'Connor dissented,
supporting the advertising industry's position on the immediacy
of the threat to free speech the Kasky decision will have.
Supreme Court's "Non-Decision" and Nike's Settlement Likely To Have A Negative Impact on Corporate Speech For Foreseeable Future
Joseph J. Lewczak (jlewczak@dglaw.com)
Marc Rachman (mrachman@dglaw.com)
Nike
Inc., et al, vs. Marc Kasky. Brief of Amici Curiae. The Association
of National Advertising, Inc., The American Advertising Federation,
And The American Association of Advertising Agencies in Support
of Petitioners.
Howard
J. Rubin (hrubin@dglaw.com)
Ronald
R. Urbach (rurbach@dglaw.com)
Joseph
J. Lewczak (jlewczak@dglaw.com)
Marc Rachman (mrachman@dglaw.com)
Nike
Inc., et al, vs. Marc Kasky. Lodging For Brief of Amici Curiae.
The Association of National Advertising, Inc., The American Advertising
Federation, And The American Association of Advertising Agencies
in Support of Petitioners.
Howard
J. Rubin (hrubin@dglaw.com)
Ronald
R. Urbach (rurbach@dglaw.com)
Joseph
J. Lewczak (jlewczak@dglaw.com)
Marc Rachman (mrachman@dglaw.com)
|